Anna ([info]troubleinchina) wrote,
@ 2009-05-01 17:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:angry
Entry tags:blog against disablism, disability, fandom & disability, fandom: torchwood

BADD: Bloody Torchwood
Blogging Against Disablism Day, May 1st 2009If you haven't seen Torchwood, I'm not entirely sure how to describe it. It's a Doctor Who spinoff where Captain Jack Harkness and his band of misfits battle to keep the Earth safe from aliens arriving in Cardiff, Wales. There is a Rift in Time and Space that is the Plot Device when needed - aliens pop out of it and, sometimes, people get sucked into it.

It's also a show where sex and flirtation are part of the plot. Episodes have revolved entirely around sex, such as the one with "sex pollen", but sexuality, flirtations, and explicit sexual relationships - both same sex and opposite sex - have all been main or side plots. One throw-away line that's often quoted 'round the fandom is recurring guest star (and ex-lover of Jack's) Captain John Hart's comments about how attractive he finds a poodle.

But of course no one in Torchwood would ever flirt with someone with a disability. They've never had the chance - no one with a visible disability has ever been on the show.

Oh wait! I tell a lie! Of course someone who has a disability and is deformed has been on the show! I totally forgot. Let me tell you about it.

In Adrift, an episode in late Season 2, Gwen Cooper realises that several people have gone missing in Cardiff, and slowly starts to piece together that they've been "taken by the Rift". The episode focuses on the story of one mother, Nikki Bevan, whose son had gone missing seven months earlier. It shows her grief, and her obsession with finding out what happened to her son. She's loving and emotionally invested in the search, in contrast to the growing hardness of viewer-standin Gwen.

I'll skip a lot of summary, which you can read at Wikipedia should you wish.

Guess what! They find Nikki's son! He comes back disfigured, having seen into the heart of a dark star, and has aged 40 years, but he's still her son. However, Jack has been keeping him in an underground lair with no windows and concrete, unpainted walls. All the doors are locked from the outside, so the inmates can't possibly get out. They're even transported to the dungeon with bags over their heads so they can't see where they're going, and no one can see them. And they're left there, locked away from the world. For their own good.

Against Jack's orders, Gwen brings Nikki to see her son. Nikki is at first horrified at what remains of the boy she knew, but quickly starts insisting that she wants to care for him. That she loves him. That she's the best person to be with him as he recovers. He's her son, after all, and even if she has to keep him away from the windows, she'll love him and take care of him.

Until the screaming starts, of course. Then she can't cope. She can't ever cope with someone who screams like that. She runs out of the room, and the next time we see her she's putting away all of his things. Now, he's not her son anymore. There's no turning back. He screams, because he's seen horrors, and she can't imagine this thing is her son.

In her final scene, she makes Gwen promise not to tell anyone else what happened to their children, because not knowing is better than knowing your child will spend the rest of hir natural life with a disability.

You may have noticed throughout my write-up I haven't referred to Nikki's child by name. That's because the story isn't about him. He's a prop to tell us about Gwen, about Jack, about Nikki. Once he's revealed as being discardable, we never see him again.

I wrote about my first, gutted reaction to this episode when I watched it, but have never been able to get over it. I want to participate in the general fandom-related squee and enjoyment, but all I can think of is this show thinks having a child with a disability, even a severe one, is worse than having a child disappear. All I can think of is the complete ignorance of the experiences of families with disabilities, whose children do scream and scream and scream, or do some other harming activity, because of their disability, and their parents love them anyway. I think about how this is another episode of television that's used a person with a disability as a way for the non-disabled to learn something about themselves.

I think about how they decided disability and deformity would be their stand-in for horrible and unimaginable.

That's what ablism is. It's implying that a mother is making a huge sacrifice by choosing to interact with her son who has a disability. It's saying that having a disability is the worst thing that can happen to someone, that it makes them so horrible they should be locked away. It's not even thinking to add a ten second scene where Gwen, the so-called heart of the show, tells Jack that he will buy some bloody paint for the walls, that he'll put some carpet down, that he'll move these people (they are still people, Jack) to a better place, because they don't deserve to be locked away from fresh air and sky.

His name was Jonah.




(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]furikku
2009-05-01 08:49 pm UTC (link)
In her final scene, she makes Gwen promise not to tell anyone else what happened to their children, because not knowing is better than knowing your child will spend the rest of hir natural life with a disability.

Granted, it might be worse for some people, but I was under the impression that for a lot of people, the not knowing was even worse than the knowing, so that's like a failure on human psychology in general.

Unless it was some failed attempt to make it be, "THIS IS THE WORST THING IN THE WORLD EVER!!!" in which case it doesn't really seem to work. :/

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2009-05-01 08:55 pm UTC (link)
You're supposed to come away from it with the idea that the true tragedy is what happened to Gwen, and Nikki's message is that Jack was right to lock these people away and warn Gwen from telling them. In light of learning about Annie Farlow today, I need to reject that message.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]furikku
2009-05-01 08:57 pm UTC (link)
aaaaaaaaaaaaa that is like one of the worst messages!

YOU DO NOT MAKE THAT KIND OF DECISION FOR OTHER PEOPLE THAT IS NOT YOUR RIGHT AAAAAAUGH

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tevriel
2009-05-02 12:26 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that episode was pretty crap, frankly. And Jack seemed out-of-character to me...

I don't know. Like, the idea was that she was fine with him being aged and a bit deformed and ruined, etc, but then the screaming did her in. Or something like that, anyway.

I agreed that it seemed pretty terrible... and even if you can make a case that people Jack was taking were in fact better kept away from their families etc (which wasn't argued convincingly, but I can see as feasible, especially since if they're all like Jonah it does in fact break the secrecy notion) - why do they have to be kept in a dungeon?

I blame Russell T. Davies.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2009-05-03 10:30 am UTC (link)
I am very unfond of that man.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]marydell
2009-05-02 03:19 am UTC (link)
OMG, that's frickin horrible.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2009-05-03 10:30 am UTC (link)
It was an awful episode, truly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lauredhel
2009-05-02 09:19 am UTC (link)
Argh. Yes. That episode was a hot mess.

I've been wondering (and no, I'm not up to it now, because it would involve rewatching the whole thing) whether anyone has written/was going to write about the Daleks of the Nine and Ten series, and how they're being used as metaphors - either subtle or obvious - for people with disabilities.

(spoilers)

Davros falls fairly obviously into the evil-wheelchair-dude archetype, but there's a lot more in there: the accidentally and deliberately genetically altered Daleks Caan and Sek, the construction of the Cult of Skaro as "insane", their eventual confinement to the void in a scene with large amounts of clean-white-wall imagery...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2009-05-03 10:29 am UTC (link)
I'm in the process of looking for meta on disability & the Who-verse. I've got a couple of leads - when I find them, I'll let you know?

Sincerely, though, that episode still makes me see red when I think about it too much. Grrrr....

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-03 01:43 pm UTC (link)
not saying that it solves the problem of the episode, but my take on the screaming was not so much that the mother couldn't cope with the screaming perse, but with the awfulnes of what lay behind it. That the people taken by the rift had experienced something so horrific, so uncommunicatable to the people on our earth. That the seclusion was a protection from that knowledge.

I've seen people rejecting their severely depressed/psychotic children, or keeping on insisting that everything was fine. People do indeed built seclusions and closed their ears to the screaming.

But don't promote that behaviour!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]wijsgeer
2009-05-03 01:45 pm UTC (link)
that was me

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…