Anna ([info]troubleinchina) wrote,
@ 2008-09-08 15:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: irritated
Entry tags:no - i really *do* care that much

The Politics of Victimhood
In an article in the Globe & Mail on Sunday, Judith Timson used one of those sentences that irritates me to no end: "But Ms. Palin, ..., not only sent a clear signal that she was nobody's victim ..."

Ah, yes. The so-called "victim card". Fastest way to make someone appear "weak" or "unable to cope".

Of course Sarah Palin is no one's victim. She's running for the second-highest position in the US with strong support from the presidential nominee. When feminists point out the sexism directed at Ms Palin, they're not doing it to protect her from the big mean media. Ms Palin doesn't need that at all.

Why we're doing it is because this sort of stuff hurts women everywhere. When Ms Palin is attacked in the media for being daring enough to go to work when she's got a young child at home, it stokes up the so-called mommy wars, frames that debate as being legitimate, and again sends messages to (middle and upper class) women: stay at home, because if you run for office, this is what you'll get. Your parenting choices will be scrutinized, mocked, and torn apart by the media, by bloggers, and by Jo Average On the Street.

[For many women "Do I go back to work after pregnancy" isn't a question - it's the only way to keep a roof overhead and food on the plate. It certainly would be in my case.]

Articles written about Palin's hair and shoes, blog sites dedicated to how "fuckable" she is, and various places repeatedly bringing up her "beauty queen" past, are short for "You must be THIS attractive to run for office, ladies, and even then we're going to reduce you to just that."

This stuff hurts all women, especially women who are involved in politics. I tell people who think I'd be a "good" politician that I couldn't stand the idea of my decision not to have children, my atypical attractiveness, and my loathing of fashion being something that would be used against me by my opponent, as opposed to silly things like my record on the issues and my political affiliation.

The same thing is happening to Sarah Palin right now.

The answer isn't (as is implied by "no one's victim") to demand the Big Bad Media back off and play nice. The answer is to demand the new media focus on what's really important here: Palin's stand on the issues.

Not to protect her, but because focusing on a woman's attractiveness, her decisions regarding going back to work, and her fashion choices is just plain wrong.

The goal should be this: "[T]he day when you ask, what is the most important thing about a female politician? And the answer will be, her policies, stupid."




(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]looniewolf
2008-09-08 06:46 pm UTC (link)
The problem being: what are her issues? I'd like to see her in several professional media interviews so that we can get a better glimpse at the person that Sarah Palin is and try to get a better understanding of her as a person. And by professional, I mean interviews that look at her politics and not her family.

For instance: her views on abortion. I respect the fact she is completely against it. It's a stand very few anti-abortionists are willing to stand with... and it's one I disagree with. It's a deal-breaker with me in fact (as I feel women alone have the right to choose if they wish to carry a child to term; men can offer to help and offer support... but if a woman truly doesn't want to carry a child to term, then the man should have no say in the process), but I still respect her opinion on this issue.

I suspect that once we've had several interviews concerning her policies and views then the media storm surrounding her will subside and she'll be just another candidate.

Rob H.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]zingerella
2008-09-08 07:09 pm UTC (link)
Her policies are apparent in her voting record and her stated policies as Governor of Alaska. Even more conservative pundits have managed to glean a few of them:

She's pro-oil drilling in Alaska, and other parts of the US.
She's anti-abortion, even in cases of rape or incest, or to save the life of the pregnant woman.
She's suing the U.S. to prevent protections for polar bears threatened by global warming.
She's attempted to ban books in public libraries.
She ran up a debt in a town she governed, which town was debt-free when she came to power.
She's in favour of the war in Iraq and of the ongoing U.S. military presence there.

All of this information is easily available and easily verifiable. It's not like nobody's reported on it, but the fact- and policy-based reportage has been overshadowed by discussions of her family life, her suitability for office based on her parenting practices, gossip, and slavering assessments of her appearance.

She's not doing interviews right now, fact- and policy-based or otherwise, so it's very difficult to know what she'll say her policies might be, once she's been briefed by the campaign managers. All we can do is look at her record. This used to be what journalists and reporters did.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]finderofstuff
2008-09-08 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Don't forget that she's also being investigated for possibly abusing the power of her office to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from his job as a state trooper.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]troubleinchina
2008-09-08 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Technocracygirl tells me she also slashed funding to special needs classrooms while in office.


I know I'm shocked.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]zingerella
2008-09-08 07:21 pm UTC (link)
Heh. With her special-needs baby? I guess accommodations to help students with special needs attend and benefit from school constitute "pork."

I confess that I haven't felt the need to learn too much more about Governor Palin than what I've been seeing every damn' where in the blogosphere, because 1) I wouldn't vote for her, even if I could, even with what little I do know about her (i.e., she's evil), and 2) I have a greater chance of success influencing people I know in Canada to think about issues in Canada, and use their votes in the Canadian elections wisely, so I'm directing more energy to that than to the U.S. one.

That said, I think you're spot-on, Anna—she may be a minion of evil, but we need to focus on the attributes that tell us she's evil. We all know that evil can look like anything it wants to look like. Her appearance and to a lesser, but still important extent, her family life are really silly things to be discussing, and yeah, this kind of belittling is part of what keeps people like you and me out of public life.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]looniewolf
2008-09-08 07:32 pm UTC (link)
Heh. I actually know about those points. I didn't want to go off on a "Sarah Palin is evil" rant... but rather to suggest that the news media needs to interview her and have her explain these policies and see if she feels they need to be defended or not.

The cynic in me suspects Palin was chosen partly because of the fact she is a recent mother and because of her daughter's pregnancy and because of other related issues because it would distract the media from what she's done as governor and into a feeding frenzy about her personal life.

In turn, the media has been demonized by the Republican party and it won't matter that they report the rot that has taken the core of Palin's administration, it'll just be considered further "sexism" and "media bias" rather than legitimate reporting.

Rob H.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ldragoon
2008-09-08 07:36 pm UTC (link)
I totally agree. I may be ripping her a new one in my blog, but it's over her stand on ISSUES, NOT what she looks like. The media did the exact same misogynistic shit when Hillary was in the run. Only this time it's "flattering" misogyny, I gues. Or something. >:(

Edited because: AUGH, my spelling sucks today!

Edited at 2008-09-08 07:38 pm UTC

(Reply to this)


[info]tatterpunk
2008-09-10 01:10 am UTC (link)
... I wondered whether I should share this with you.

Talk about wishing other people would stop proving your point for you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2008-09-10 01:13 am UTC (link)
There's another that's dressed up as a dominatrix.

But but but! There's no SEXISM HERE.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tatterpunk
2008-09-10 01:15 am UTC (link)
It just shows that she's POPULAR! Isn't that what all politicians want?

*head in hands; groans*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2008-09-10 01:21 am UTC (link)
Here, read this. It'll totes help.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tatterpunk
2008-09-10 01:23 am UTC (link)
Sandwiches or biscuits don't need cooking, Anna!

*laughs self sick*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]troubleinchina
2008-09-10 01:25 am UTC (link)
Global warming (which totes doesn't exist anyway) is caused by Those Damned Africans.

I'm going to work. *wibbles*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tatterpunk
2008-09-10 01:31 am UTC (link)
Cookfires: the surprise environmental killers.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…